New Health Care

HEALTH CARE WORLDS: The law on the protection of patient care and affordable, the law of the land in 2010, but the debate about the existence and enforcement of the new year with rage. The shortcomings of the law policy are already a serious impact on the health insurance and the costs, but they are part of a broader and deeper problem: the appropriate role for the federal government in health care health of Americans. The position of the public on this issue was in the wake of the adoption of the new law. To ensure easy ME has the answers

How to play the ramifications of Obama Care continues, it becomes clear that the changes are bad. The new law cuts $ 575 billion from Medicare, but uses the savings to health care, a new law, but deal with the bad debt to finance the Medicare faces. "Flexion of the cost curve" was one of the original goals Obamacare, but reported the Medicare actuary, that, if the law is the new curve effect, it is in the wrong direction: up not down.

In addition, employers reported increases countless Obamacare accelerated their health insurance premiums, to encourage them to consider, pass or drop coverage at higher cost to the employees and their families. Mandates and new regulations are likely to impede the ability of companies providing health insurance to employees and threaten negative impact on the economy as a whole. Finally, if the law is fully online and the actual costs are detected, Obama is expected to increase significantly Care, the budget deficit in the U.S..

But the debate over political blunders and in the realm of legitimate federal role in health care goes. Obamacare increases the influence of Washington over all aspects of the system of U.S. health care system, not just in the insurance market, but also at the bedside. Medicare beneficiaries will be affected mainly by the creation of new bureaucratic institutions, and from top to bottom, which included the cost of mechanisms in the law.

Meanwhile, Americans continue all or part of the new law will oppose health care reform. Pollsters like Rasmussen show that Americans ranged support for the repeal of Care Obama 50 percent to 63 percent since the adoption of the law. In November, American voters have decided to send a wave of new lawmakers in Congress, many of whom campaigned for the repeal of the law. The provisions of Obama Care are not consistent with what the Americans want to repeal the strengthening of the case and a new direction for healthcare reform.

So, what's the alternative? The reform needs to transform the health system to the control of individuals over their spending on health care and strengthen the decision-making. Patients, including those covered by Medicare and Medicaid should be able to choose the health plans in the private insurance market, which best fit their needs.

Promote market reforms increase competition between insurance companies and more choices for consumers would, so they are looking for the best value for their dollars. This bottom-up approach to reducing health care costs would be to maintain the quality of care in the United States continued. It would put doctors and patients, not bureaucrats in Washington, responsible decisions for the care of individuals.

As the conversation continued, are the plans that embody these principles more traction. U.S. Rep. Paul Ryan "Roadmap for the Future of America" ​​would radically change Medicare, Medicaid and health care system as a whole, for the patients in the driver's seat. Ryan and Alice Rivlin, both members of the National Commission for fiscal responsibility and reform, and proposed a similar plan for Medicare and Medicaid, which would replace the highly centralized, bureaucratic system with a defined contribution program, with greater autonomy to the beneficiaries.