Treatment of Epilepsy With Surgery Recovery Guarantee More

HEALTH WORLD: Handling patients with epilepsy (seizures or epilepsy) was mostly done with drug therapy. While surgery is still considered too extreme to be done. But treatment through the operation turned out to better ensure the long-term recovery.

As a new study finds nearly half of those who have undergone surgery or surgery for epilepsy, remain free of seizures until 10 years later.

Currently most of the management of patients with epilepsy is drug therapy. However, if the drug is not able to control epileptic seizures for many years. Only later after the patients were advised to undergo surgery.

Researchers say that some patients with focal epilepsy must be eligible to undergo the surgical procedure more quickly. Focal Epilepsy is the most common form of seizure disorder.

"Handling of neurosurgical patients with epilepsy or neurosurgery, used for the treatment of focal epilepsy that can not respond to medication. Neurosurgical can allow the cessation of episodes of seizures in epilepsy patients," said study leader Dr. John Duncan, who is also a professor of neurology at the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery and Imperial College London, England, as quoted from MSN Health, Friday (10/14/2011).

As many as 82 percent of people who have undergone neurosurgical have felt a great benefit, ie never having seizures again. Based on the results of these studies the treatment of epilepsy patients with surgical procedures should be considered when 2-3 drugs have failed to control seizures.

"Some people with epilepsy think that taking drugs while pregnant are at increased risk of birth defects in babies. Given the severity of side effects of some anti-seizure drug. So that particular patient would be better if made the surgical procedure as an alternative treatment," the researchers said.

The study results were published in The Lancet issue of October 15, 2011. The research team sees long-term outcomes of 615 adults who underwent surgical procedures for epilepsy at the National Hospital in the year 1990-2008. With an average of the observed patients had suffered from seizures for 20 years before surgery.

"Five years post-surgery, 52 percent of these patients remained free of seizures. And after 10 years, 47 percent of these patients remained free of seizures. But over the long term, 11 percent of these patients had simple partial seizures. Simple partial seizures do not involve loss of consciousness but it seems to affect the chances of recovery, "said the researchers.

Surgical procedure for epilepsy is to cut a small portion of the brain where the seizures usually begins. Brain regions most often cut when undergoing surgery for epilepsy is temporal lobe area.

The procedure is known as the anterior temporal resection. But depending on the location of the seizure focus as determined by the physician through an MRI and other tests, epilepsy surgery can be performed on other areas of the brain.

"The operation usually does not interfere with temporal lobe memory or mental ability of a patient. Surgical outside the temporal lobe called the extratemporal cortical resection," said Dr. Duncan.

The researchers found that patients who underwent extratemporal cortical resection as much as 2 times more likely to have seizures again. In addition, patients who experienced simple partial seizures for 2 years after the operation will be 2.5 times more likely to have seizures that affect consciousness. Patients who have long been free of seizures, the less likely to experience recurrence.

"These studies have shown that, epilepsy surgery has been very effective in nearly 50 percent of epilepsy patients without worsening of the condition after surgery. The study is important because the observed safety and effectiveness of surgical therapy for epilepsy in the clinical environment," said the researcher.

New Health Care

HEALTH CARE WORLDS: The law on the protection of patient care and affordable, the law of the land in 2010, but the debate about the existence and enforcement of the new year with rage. The shortcomings of the law policy are already a serious impact on the health insurance and the costs, but they are part of a broader and deeper problem: the appropriate role for the federal government in health care health of Americans. The position of the public on this issue was in the wake of the adoption of the new law. To ensure easy ME has the answers

How to play the ramifications of Obama Care continues, it becomes clear that the changes are bad. The new law cuts $ 575 billion from Medicare, but uses the savings to health care, a new law, but deal with the bad debt to finance the Medicare faces. "Flexion of the cost curve" was one of the original goals Obamacare, but reported the Medicare actuary, that, if the law is the new curve effect, it is in the wrong direction: up not down.

In addition, employers reported increases countless Obamacare accelerated their health insurance premiums, to encourage them to consider, pass or drop coverage at higher cost to the employees and their families. Mandates and new regulations are likely to impede the ability of companies providing health insurance to employees and threaten negative impact on the economy as a whole. Finally, if the law is fully online and the actual costs are detected, Obama is expected to increase significantly Care, the budget deficit in the U.S..

But the debate over political blunders and in the realm of legitimate federal role in health care goes. Obamacare increases the influence of Washington over all aspects of the system of U.S. health care system, not just in the insurance market, but also at the bedside. Medicare beneficiaries will be affected mainly by the creation of new bureaucratic institutions, and from top to bottom, which included the cost of mechanisms in the law.

Meanwhile, Americans continue all or part of the new law will oppose health care reform. Pollsters like Rasmussen show that Americans ranged support for the repeal of Care Obama 50 percent to 63 percent since the adoption of the law. In November, American voters have decided to send a wave of new lawmakers in Congress, many of whom campaigned for the repeal of the law. The provisions of Obama Care are not consistent with what the Americans want to repeal the strengthening of the case and a new direction for healthcare reform.

So, what's the alternative? The reform needs to transform the health system to the control of individuals over their spending on health care and strengthen the decision-making. Patients, including those covered by Medicare and Medicaid should be able to choose the health plans in the private insurance market, which best fit their needs.

Promote market reforms increase competition between insurance companies and more choices for consumers would, so they are looking for the best value for their dollars. This bottom-up approach to reducing health care costs would be to maintain the quality of care in the United States continued. It would put doctors and patients, not bureaucrats in Washington, responsible decisions for the care of individuals.

As the conversation continued, are the plans that embody these principles more traction. U.S. Rep. Paul Ryan "Roadmap for the Future of America" ​​would radically change Medicare, Medicaid and health care system as a whole, for the patients in the driver's seat. Ryan and Alice Rivlin, both members of the National Commission for fiscal responsibility and reform, and proposed a similar plan for Medicare and Medicaid, which would replace the highly centralized, bureaucratic system with a defined contribution program, with greater autonomy to the beneficiaries.

Food That Can Make People Dreams

HEALTH WORDS Generally no one can predict when someone will experience a dream while sleeping. But it was a dream that comes can be influenced by food intake. What food is it?

Professor Tore Nielsen, director of the University of Montreal's Dream and Nightmares Laboratory conducted a study to investigate the relationship between food and a dream experienced by a person.

Most dreams occur when a person's eyes are already in constant motion like he was watching something. This stage usually occurs approximately 70-90 minutes after falling asleep.

Note there are some foods that can trigger a person to experience a good dream or commonly called the 'lucid nutrition ", as quoted from Livestrong, Wednesday (05/10/2011), namely:

1. cheese
Eating cheese before bed is believed to lead to a better dream. Milena Corredig from the University of Guelph in Canada said that the cheese can produce chemicals that send signals to the brain.

2. milk
Consumption of milk does not just help you sleep soundly but also trigger a better dream. This is because the amino acids in dairy products are good nutrients for the nervous system that makes the mind stay active. But the milk should not consume sweet milk, because sugar can make a person more difficult to sleep.

3. Orange juice or other fresh fruit
Orange juice or other fruit juice has been known to induce lucid dreams, real and memorable. For that try to drink a glass of juice or about 250 ml, but do not overdo it because it can make a person continue to wake up at night because he wanted to urinate so that disrupt sleep.

In addition to foods that can trigger a dream, some foods and beverages should not be consumed before bed because it can make people nightmares like caffeine beverages and foods that are difficult to digest. This condition is likely due to interfere with digestion and makes the body temperature increased.